Edge Provocation and Strategic Probing: Russia’s Deep Intent Behind Frequent Incursions into Europe

In recent times, Russian military aircraft and drones have approached or entered the borders or airspace of NATO and EU countries such as Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Romania, sparking renewed security concerns across Europe. During NATO military exercises, Russian reconnaissance aircraft twice flew over the German frigate Hamburg in the Baltic Sea. Numerous "unidentified" drones have been spotted over airports and even military bases in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom, causing disruptions and shutdowns. Russia is widely suspected to be the true orchestrator behind these drone incursions. A Russian warship was found quietly anchored near Danish waters, while drones disabled operations at airports in Copenhagen, Aalborg, and elsewhere.

These airspace violations constitute blatant provocations by Putin’s Russia against NATO member states and the sovereignty and security of Europe as a whole. In response, Estonia invoked Article 4 of the NATO Treaty, requesting consultations with its allies. Poland also requested NATO talks and, for the first time, shot down a Russian drone that had breached its airspace. According to NATO Article 5, an attack on any NATO member is considered an attack on all, and collective defense would be triggered. Putin’s provocations, therefore, carry the real risk of escalating into direct military conflict between Russia and NATO.

Putin is fully aware that a direct military confrontation with NATO would expose Russia to retaliation far beyond what it has encountered in Ukraine. So why does he continue to authorize drone and aircraft incursions into the airspace of NATO’s eastern flank? What strategic intentions and calculations lie beneath these provocations? What military consequences could they trigger?

Multiple Strategic Intentions

Putin’s military provocations—particularly the incursion of Russian military aircraft into or near NATO airspace on its eastern flank—reflect a series of strategic intentions.

1. Projecting Military Presence and National Pride
   Putin aims to continually demonstrate Russia’s military presence in the region to the West, especially NATO. This is not only to pressure NATO member states but also to boost national pride among Russian citizens and signal to adversaries that Russia remains a global military power, capable of operating in the West’s "backyard."
2. Testing NATO’s Defenses and Weakening Deterrence
   These provocations can be interpreted as “low-intensity attacks” intended to test NATO's response speed and air defense capabilities, while simultaneously attempting to erode NATO's deterrent power. By persistently approaching NATO airspace, Russia evaluates NATO’s political and military reactions, particularly in the strategically vital Baltic region. This helps assess both NATO’s rapid response mechanisms and the alliance’s readiness to counter Russian maneuvers.
3. Forcing Dialogue Through Escalation
   Putin’s provocations often coincide with diplomatic brinkmanship. Tensions are deliberately escalated in the hope of forcing the West into dialogue. While risky, this strategy has sometimes succeeded in drawing NATO into diplomatic engagements, allowing Russia to negotiate from a stronger position. For example, military challenges to NATO may be used to press for concessions in other areas—such as sanctions relief or reduced support for Ukraine.
4. Shaping a Favorable Endgame in Ukraine
   Behind Putin’s strategy may lie the intent to pressure the EU and NATO into accepting Russia’s territorial gains in Ukraine and the conditions for ceasefire negotiations. By manufacturing localized tensions and crises, he aims to instill fear and fatigue in the West, thereby gaining leverage in eventual peace talks and securing a settlement favorable to Russia—without triggering a full-blown war with NATO.
5. Consolidating Domestic Power
   Within Russia, military and security institutions wield significant influence. By projecting power abroad, Putin bolsters the military’s standing at home and maintains control over these institutions. Foreign provocations help shift attention away from domestic issues, such as economic hardship or battlefield setbacks, and consolidate his domestic support.
6. Psychological Pressure on Eastern Europe
   Putin’s tactics also exert psychological pressure on NATO’s Eastern European members. These acts test NATO’s tolerance and resolve. They are not only military provocations but also political ones—signaling that Russia has the capability to escalate conflict and potentially threaten NATO’s strategic stability. Moreover, hybrid tools like drones, migration crises, and disinformation campaigns can provoke political polarization and sow division within Western democracies.
7. Diverting NATO’s Resources
   These provocations force NATO to spread its resources thin—deploying fighters, satellites, warships, and surveillance tools in the Baltic region and elsewhere. This distraction could weaken NATO’s ability to respond elsewhere, such as in Ukraine or other global hotspots.

Potential Military Consequences

Putin’s provocations do not necessarily signal a desire for outright war with NATO. Rather, they represent a “gray zone” strategy of military and diplomatic coercion. However, such tactics inevitably escalate military tensions and increase the likelihood of localized conflict. For instance, close encounters between Russian and NATO aircraft could lead to misjudgments and unintended escalation.

These provocations are likely to prompt NATO members to strengthen their cooperation and defense posture, especially bolstering air defense capabilities in Eastern Europe. Persistent threats may force NATO to adjust its military strategy or even establish additional facilities in the region.

Ironically, Putin’s efforts to pressure the West may backfire by prompting NATO to increase military support for Ukraine—through improved air defense systems, delivery of advanced weapons (such as U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles), and expanded military training programs.

If these provocations continue to escalate, they may destabilize the broader strategic landscape, particularly in the Baltic region. Countries such as Poland, Denmark, Finland, and Sweden could respond with their own defensive measures, with lasting implications for European and global security. In fact, EU countries and Ukraine have already begun consultations on building a joint "drone wall" to enhance collective defense against drone intrusions.

Drone disruptions may also trigger social panic and division within European nations, eroding public confidence in governments and opening new fronts in the broader "hybrid warfare" beyond Ukraine.

These incidents not only disrupt civilian aviation and cause economic losses—they send a dangerous message: even in peacetime, Europe is not immune to the infiltration of warfare tactics.

Real-World Conditions Enabling Putin’s Strategy

Putin’s willingness to engage in "calculated brinkmanship" and limited provocations against NATO stems from several real-world factors:

• Nuclear Deterrence: Russia remains a nuclear superpower with strategic parity with the U.S., allowing it to use the threat of "limited nuclear conflict" to deter direct retaliation and embolden non-nuclear provocations.
• Perceived NATO Divisions: Despite NATO’s strength, Moscow views the alliance as politically fragmented and often hesitant, particularly due to divergent stances from countries like Hungary and Slovakia. Putin may see localized provocations as a way to test and exploit these cracks.
• Economic Resilience: Russia’s economy has not collapsed. The military-industrial complex is still functioning, and energy revenues continue to finance the war, despite sanctions. Western "sanctions fatigue" gives Putin confidence.
• Information Warfare Prowess: Russia is adept at bluffing, psychological manipulation, and spreading uncertainty—eroding public support for democratic governments.

However, Putin is also constrained:

• Depleted Conventional Forces: Russia’s military has been severely weakened by the war in Ukraine, facing heavy losses and recruitment challenges.
• Risk of NATO Retaliation: Any attack on NATO territory would trigger Article 5, potentially leading to Russia’s own destruction.
• Western Intelligence Superiority: The West’s intelligence and surveillance capabilities limit Russia’s ability to operate in secrecy or maintain narrative control.

In summary, while Putin has the capacity for tactical risk-taking, he lacks the strategic ability to launch a full-scale war against NATO.

Strategic Calculation and Logic

Putin’s strategic calculus and operational logic can be summarized as: strategic probing + phased escalation + deliberate ambiguity + prevention of a unified Western counteraction. He is willing to engage in limited-risk ventures, but is unlikely to initiate a full-scale war with NATO unless confronted with extreme circumstances. His provocations are calculated acts of brinkmanship, not reckless strategic gambles. Putin is a practitioner of localized adventurism, not large-scale strategic confrontation.

He is especially skilled at waging “gray zone warfare”—including intelligence operations, proxy wars, information manipulation, energy blackmail, economic infiltration, drone incursions, and cyberattacks. These are all tactical maneuvers that are difficult to trace or hold accountable.

Putin’s strategy is not to confront NATO head-on but to fracture the West, test red lines, and generate internal instability—using a series of actions that are deliberately ambiguous and deniable, thereby weakening NATO's cohesion and political will.

Drone interference with airports, cyberattacks, backing of far-right extremist movements, and the orchestration of migration crises are all components of low-intensity conflict. What Putin seeks is not a direct military victory, but to engineer NATO’s internal collapse without a fight—a “defeat without war.”

Over the past 20 years, Putin’s foreign policy and historical actions follow a consistent pattern:

Probe → Escalate → Withdraw or Freeze when faced with firm resistance.
This is evident in:

• the 2008 war in Georgia,
• the 2014 annexation of Crimea,
• the 2015 military intervention in Syria,
• and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

What Putin fears most is a unified Western response, rapid mobilization, and military escalation signals from NATO. It’s worth noting that Russia has never deliberately attacked a country with a collective defense mechanism like NATO.

While Putin does not intend to go to war with NATO, the risk is not zero. Possible triggers include:

• Misjudging NATO’s red lines—such as overstepping boundaries near Poland or Estonia
• A “false flag” operation being misinterpreted as an act of war
• Deteriorating battlefield conditions pushing Putin into a desperate, all-in gamble
• Domestic instability within Russia prompting him to escalate an external conflict as a diversion

Conclusion

In essence, Putin’s “gray zone provocations” against Europe are not just military maneuvers—they are calculated strategic gambits. The use of drones, aircraft, information warfare, and hybrid tools constitutes a low-intensity conflict playbook aimed at dividing the West, deflecting domestic pressures, and reinforcing Russia’s international posture.

Putin is unlikely to deliberately seek a full-scale war with NATO, but he possesses both the means and the will to carry out controlled provocations to serve his strategic and political ends. His method relies on low-cost, high-ambiguity tactics to challenge Europe’s security environment without crossing into overt warfare.

This form of “brinkmanship”, while tactically flexible, carries the inherent risk of miscalculation and unintended escalation. If a red line—especially a NATO red line—is breached, the situation could spiral rapidly out of control, leading to a potentially irreversible military conflict.

— October 6, 2025

-------------------

Reference List

1. Wikipedia contributors. (2025). 2025 Russian drone incursion into Poland. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Russian_drone_incursion_into_Poland

Politico. (2025, September). Russia’s Su-24s buzz NATO ship during Baltic drills. https://www.politico.eu/article/russian-jets-buzz-nato-ship-baltic/

2. Deutsche Welle. (2025, September). Poland, Estonia invoke NATO Article 4 after Russian drone incidents. https://www.dw.com/en/poland-estonia-nato-article-4-russian-drones/a-67382845

Wikipedia contributors. (2025). Operation Eastern Sentry. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eastern_Sentry

Anadolu Agency. (2025, October). Poland says Russia testing NATO with drone incursions. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/poland-says-russia-testing-nato-with-drone-incursions/3687444

3. SETA Foundation. (2025, October). Russian drone incursions: Blurring the line between provocations and probing. https://www.setav.org/en/russian-drone-incursions-blurring-the-line-between-provocations-and-probing

Associated Press. (2025, October). EU chief says Russia is waging a ‘gray zone campaign’ in Europe. https://apnews.com/article/8db469f8bb5dbc26abcc9f2884c256c1

Business Insider. (2025, October). NATO’s air policing mission is getting riskier. https://www.businessinsider.com/nato-air-policing-riskier-f-35-gripens-f-16-front-2025-10

4. Grey Dynamics. (2025, October). Repeated Russian grey-zone incursions into NATO airspace. https://greydynamics.com/nato-russia-article-4-violation-airspace/

New Eurasian Strategies Centre. (2025, October). Escalation in Europe: How the Kremlin is testing NATO’s limits. https://nestcentre.org/escalation-in-europe/

5. Reuters. (2025, October 5). Germany’s Merz: We assume Russia is behind drone incursions. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/germanys-merz-we-assume-russia-is-behind-drone-incursions-2025-10-05

Euractiv. (2025, October). EU, Ukraine plan joint ‘drone wall’ to counter Russian aerial threats. https://www.euractiv.com/section/defense/news/eu-ukraine-plan-drone-wall/

The Guardian. (2025, October 6). Russian drones disrupt major EU airports. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/06/russian-drones-disrupt-eu-airports